I had a "good" night's sleep and time to think this situation over a little and I've come to the conclusion
This morning when I woke, or rather failed to sleep some more, I had decided to go over to their blog to pen a nice letter on why people are having a bad reaction to "The De®vaes Institute" copyrighting and enforcing usage of the term "Urban Homestead". However, they've closed down the comments on their blog at least where this particular topic is concerned and so I didn't pursue the idea of a letter any further.
At this point I've come to the conclusion that they just don't care to read about the issue. They'll write up their rights, but they don't want to read an opposing viewpoint. This may be due to hot tempers and abusive posts, this seems to be commonplace on the internet after all.
They did what they did and they're sticking to their guns.
For me it all comes down to this:
If you're out to make the world a better place you design something like the Rocket Stove (yes, Rocket Stoves tickle my fancy), provide designs and let the world in on it without copyrighting the whole shebang. If you're interested in something other than making the world a better place you take an old idea, say that your enhancements make it brand spankin' new, lawyer up and lock it all down. Their Path to Freesomosity impinges on your right to Freedomnisism and they neither care nor see that as a fact.
And they openly admit that the "Urban Homestead" is an old idea, but claim their way of doing things makes the pre-existing terminology new and therefore their own.
I'd post a pull quote from the blog post where the above is mentioned, but I don't want to get a "De®vaes Institute Not-A-Cease-and-Disist Letter©®™". They posted it for the world to see and now the admission is out there until the internet ceases to be (I pdf'ed it just in case).
On a side note, I love what the mods did when you include the De®vaes name in a post.
